Non-Trauma Emergency CT Imaging:
How Relevant Is It to Patient Care?
Lavanya Kalla, MD,
Jessica Conn, MD,
Teresita L. Angtuaco, MD,
Ernest J. Ferris, MD
Purpose:
To investigate whether CT examinations done in non-trauma patients after
regular working hours made an impact in patient care.
Method and Materials:
A review of medical records was done for a two-month period on patients who
presented with non-trauma emergencies. In these patients, the post-imaging
diagnosis was compared to the pre-imaging referral diagnosis and physical
findings. The impact of imaging on further patient management was
determined after retrospectively reviewing the discharge summaries from the
hospital record.
Results:
Among the 274 patients undergoing after-hours Emergency CT scans for
non-trauma related conditions, 130 (47%) were neuro-related and 141 (51%)
were body CT scans. Thirty-nine (30%) neuro scans were requested for
specific reasons and 91 (70%) were requested for generic reasons such as
nonspecific mental status changes. Among the neuro scans requested for
specific reasons based on the clinical findings, 43% had a significant
finding like intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic change, or space occupying
lesion. Only 11% of the scans requested for non-localizing subjective
reasons had a significant finding. Of the body examinations, 58 (41%) were
requested based on subjective symptoms such as RLQ pain/nausea/abdominal pain
and 83 (59%) were requested for specific indications such as “rule out
appendicitis/PE/diverticulitis/SBO.” Out of the 83 examinations performed
with a specific diagnostic question, 57% had a significant finding. Of the
examinations performed for symptomatic indication, 43% showed significant
findings. Overall, imaging influenced patient care in 118 (43%) of patients,
resulting in their admission or discharge.
Conclusions:
From our study, it was concluded that imaging plays a pivotal role with
respect to patient admission and discharge in the acute setting. For
neuroradiologic studies, the yield of positive findings is greater when a
specific diagnosis is sought. However, the findings of studies performed
for generic indications played an important role in patient care. For body
imaging, there is no significant difference in the results of the scans
whether they were performed for symptomatic or specific indications.
View
powerpoint presentation of this research project.
If you have questions about this page or experience technical difficulties, please alert the web master.
This site is created and maintained by the UAMS Radiology Department.