Teaching Healing Searching Serving
Ongoing Services
Faculty & Staff
Newsletter
Teaching Scholars
Resources
  Educational Research Resources
  Team-Based Learning
  OED Library
UAMS Web-based Learning
  Teaching Scholars Program
  OED Fact Sheets
  PBL Resources
UAMS Home
OED Home

Classroom Performance System

Back to CPS Fact Sheet

On to Twelve Tips

 

 

Some success stories using other audience response systems

 

 

 

Location of Study/Participants How Used Results
Vanderbilt/Junior medical engineering students
  • Pop quizzes and in-class exercises
  • Provided instant feedback to students and faculty
  • Automated quiz grading
  • Students scored slightly higher on exam
  • Fewer students earned very low scores
  • Increased completion of reading assignments
IBM Advanced Technology Classrooms/New managers
  • In-class activities:
    • Yes/No questions
    • Multiple choice questions
    • Mean numeric entry questions
    • Correct numeric entry questions
    • Rating scale inquiries
  • Group activities
    • Game-like activities
    • Concensus building activities
  • More in-depth discussions
  • More of the class participated
  • More learning points were covered
  • Students’ apparent attentiveness increased
  • Test scores were higher
Eindhoven University of Technology
  • Exploration-to gauge the opinion of student of their understanding
  • Verification-to allow the lecturer to asses the state of the students’ comprehension
  • Interrogation-to test the ability of students to apply the work to specific situations
  • Organization-"Are you ready to continue?"
  • Students prefer lectures using the audience response system (ARS).
  • Examination results improved.
Cleveland Clinic Intensive Review of Internal Medicine Symposium
  • Pose questions to audience
  • Tabulate collective responses
  • Based speaker comments on audience responses
  • Teaching with ARS rated as more useful to attendees learning.
  • Attendees felt ARS facilitated teaching clinical reasoning and medical facts.
  • ARS was appropriate for teaching board preparatory material
  • Helped maintain alertness and stimulated interest.
  • Helped in identifying their weaknesses.
  • Allowed mistakes to be made anonymously.
University of Wales College of Medicine/Medical Students
  • Ask questions to generate discussion in a lecture class.

  • Responses were submitted anonymously.
  • Significantly more students felt that ARS use in lectures was beneficial.

  •  Increase in student-lecturer interaction.

  •  Students able to respond without the risk of embarrassment.

  • Promoted discussion.

  • Made learning more enjoyable.

  • Increased student attention.

  • Gave students more opportunities to apply their knowledge.

  • Provided feedback to students about their own performance.

  • Lectures were better organized.

  • Explodes the myth that everyone knows more than me.

  • Increased discussion among students.

 

If you have questions or comments about this page please .

Office of Educational Development
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
4301 W. Markham St., #595
Little Rock, AR 72205

 

UAMS Online     Copyright Statement     Privacy Statement