|
Location of Study/Participants |
How Used |
Results |
|
Vanderbilt/Junior medical engineering students |
- Pop quizzes and in-class exercises
- Provided instant feedback to students and faculty
- Automated quiz grading
|
- Students scored slightly higher on exam
- Fewer students earned very low scores
- Increased completion of reading assignments
|
|
IBM Advanced Technology Classrooms/New managers |
- In-class activities:
- Yes/No questions
- Multiple choice questions
- Mean numeric entry questions
- Correct numeric entry questions
- Rating scale inquiries
- Group activities
- Game-like activities
- Concensus building activities
|
- More in-depth discussions
- More of the class participated
- More learning points were covered
- Students’ apparent attentiveness increased
- Test scores were higher
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology |
- Exploration-to gauge the opinion of student of their understanding
- Verification-to allow the lecturer to asses the state of the students’ comprehension
- Interrogation-to test the ability of students to apply the work to specific situations
- Organization-"Are you ready to continue?"
|
- Students prefer lectures using the audience response system (ARS).
- Examination results improved.
|
|
Cleveland Clinic Intensive Review of Internal Medicine Symposium |
- Pose questions to audience
- Tabulate collective responses
- Based speaker comments on audience responses
|
- Teaching with ARS rated as more useful to attendees learning.
- Attendees felt ARS facilitated teaching clinical reasoning and medical facts.
- ARS was appropriate for teaching board preparatory material
- Helped maintain alertness and stimulated interest.
- Helped in identifying their weaknesses.
- Allowed mistakes to be made anonymously.
|
|
University of
Wales College of Medicine/Medical Students |
|
-
Significantly more
students felt that ARS use in lectures was beneficial.
-
Increase
in student-lecturer interaction.
-
Students
able to respond without the risk of embarrassment.
-
Promoted discussion.
-
Made learning more
enjoyable.
-
Increased student
attention.
-
Gave students more
opportunities to apply their knowledge.
-
Provided feedback to
students about their own performance.
-
Lectures were better
organized.
-
Explodes the myth that
everyone knows more than me.
- Increased
discussion among students.
|