Boyle, J., et al. (2001). The use of classroom feedback
systems to enable active learning in large engineering
mechanics classes, presented at the International Conference
on Engineering Education, August 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway.
Abstract: Many recent studies have demonstrated that
concept tests followed by immediate feedback and peer
discussion improves students’ understanding of difficult
concepts in science and engineering. These effects have been
shown both in conventional classrooms and in wired
classrooms where students respond to concept tests using a
‘classroom communication system’. These systems enable
interactive learning even with large numbers of students.
Little is known, however, about how students experience this
method of teaching and learning or about what contributes to
their enhanced understanding. To explore this, and its
implications for engineering teaching and learning, data is
being collected from mechanical engineering students taking
an introductory mechanics course using semi-structured
interviews, minute papers, critical incident analysis, and
questionnaires etc. Data on improvements in conceptual
understanding are also being collected. The study examines
differences in students’ responses to, and experiences of
three different peer discussion sequences and the
contribution of different feedback methods (ie
computer-generated, peer-generated and tutor-provided) to
learning.
Copeland, H.L., et al. (1998).
Making the continuing medical education lecture effective, The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions,
Vol. 18, pp. 227-234.
Abstract: Although the lecture appears to be
synonymous with continuing medical education (CME), the
effectiveness of lecture-based CME remains in question.
Despite conflicting data, the lecture continues to be widely
used in the delivery of CME. This study was conducted to
identify the attributes of an effective medical lecture and
to assess the impact of a computerized audience response
system (ARS) in a large CME course. Data were prospectively
collected over 3 years from physicians participating in an
intensive review of an internal medicine course. Features of
the effective medical lecture and the use of a computerized
ARS in facilitating learning were assessed with a
study-designed questionnaire. The most important features of
the effective lecture included clarity and visibility of
slides, relevance of material to the audience, and the
speaker's ability to identify key issues, engage the
audience, and present material clearly and with animation.
More than 85% of respondents felt that the ARS facilitated
teaching clinical reasoning and medical facts and helped
maintain alertness and identify their weaknesses. Lectures
using ARS were statistically significantly better rated than
those not employing it. These data identify specific
attributes of the effective medical lecture that faculty can
use to optimize teaching in CME courses. ARS technology
improves the perceived effectiveness of the medical lecture
and may facilitate learning, especially with large
audiences.
Cutts,
Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, C., & Draper, S. (2004).
Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response
systems, presented at 7th IASTED Internat. Conf. on
Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Hawaii,
16-18th August 2004. Available at:
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~quintin/papers/cate2004.pdf.
Abstract: Laurillard sees dialogue as a crucial
component of learning and she states that it is almost
impossible to achieve in lectures. This paper identifies
eight impediments to dialogue in lectures, and shows how
they are or can be overcome by (a) adjusting the activities
that take place within lectures, (b) using existing Group
Response Systems (GRSs), and (c) using extensions to GRSs
proposed in this paper. In addition to facilitating dialogue
within lectures, this paper shows how a record of the
lecture-based dialogue could be used to improve learning
environments outside the lecture.
Davis, B.G. (2001).
Tools
for Teaching. Jossey-Bass Publishers:
Abstract: An overview of the experience of the
opening two years of an institution-wide project in
introducing electronic voting equipment for lectures is
presented. Eight different departments and a wide range of
group size (up to 300) saw some use. An important aspect of
this is the organizational one of addressing the whole
institution, rather than a narrower disciplinary base. The
mobility of the equipment, the generality of the educational
analysis, and the technical support provided contributed to
this. Evaluations of each use identified (formatively) the
weakest spots and the most common benefits, and also (summatively)
showed that learners almost always saw this as providing a
net benefit to them. Various empirical indications support
the theoretical view that learning benefits depend upon
putting the pedagogy (not the technology) at the focus of
attention in each use. Perceived benefits tended to increase
as lecturers became more experienced in exploiting the
approach. The most promising pedagogical approaches appear
to be Interactive Engagement (launching peer discussions),
and Contingent Teaching – designing sessions not as fixed
scripts but to zero in on using diagnostic questions on the
points that the particular audience most needs on this
occasion.
Ganger AC, Jackson M. (2003). Wireless handheld computers in the
preclinical undergraduate curriculum. Med Educ Online
[serial online];8:3.
Abstract:
This report presents the results of a pilot project using
wireless PDAs as teaching tools in an undergraduate medical
curriculum. This technology was used to foster a transition
from a passive to an interactive learning environment in the
classroom and provided a solution for the implementation of
computer-based exams for a large class. Wayne State Medical
School recently provided model e570 Toshiba PocketPCs®
(personal digital assistants or PDAs), network interface
cards, and application software developed by CampusMobility®
to 20 sophomore medical students. The pilot group of
preclinical students used the PDAs to access web-based
course content, for communication, scheduling, to
participate in interactive teaching sessions, and to
complete course evaluations. Another part of this pilot has
been to utilize the PDAs for computer-based exams in a
wireless environment. Server authentication that restricted
access during the exams and a proctoring console to monitor
and record the PDA screens will be described in this report.
Results of a student satisfaction survey will be presented.
Horowitz, H.M. (1988). Student
response systems: Interactivity in a classroom environment,
presented at the Sixth Conference of Interactive Instruction
Delivery for the Society of Applied Learning Technology
(SALT).
Paschal,
C.B. (2002). Formative assessment in physiology teaching using
a wireless classroom communication system, Advances in
Physiology Education, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 299-308.
Abstract: Systems physiology, studied by biomedical
engineers, is an analytical way to approach the
homeostatic foundations of basic physiology. In
many systems physiology courses, students attend lectures and are given homework and reading assignments to
complete outside of class. The effectiveness of
this traditional approach was compared with an
approach in which a wireless classroom communication system was used to provide instant feedback on
in-class learning activities and reading
assignment quizzes. Homework was eliminated in
this approach. The feedback system used stimulated 100%
participation in class and facilitated rapid
formative assessment. The results of this study
indicate that learning of systems physiology concepts including physiology is at least, as if not more,
effective when in-class quizzes and activities
with instant feedback are used in place of
traditional learning activities including homework. When results of this study are interpreted in light of
possible effects of the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks on student learning in the test
group, it appears that the modified instruction may be more effective than the traditional instruction.
Nicol,
D.J., & Boyle, J.T. (2003). Peer instruction versus
class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two
interaction methods in the wired classroom, Studies in
Higher Education, 28(4), 458-473.
Abstract: Following concerns about the poor
conceptual understanding shown by science students, two US
research groups (Mazur, 1997: Dufresne et al., 1996) have
been experimenting with the use of ‘classroom communication
systems’ (CCSs) to promote dialogue in large classes. CCS
technology makes it easier to give students immediate
feedback on concept tests and to manage peer and class
discussions. Improvements in conceptual reasoning have been
shown using these methods. However, these research groups
have each piloted different discussion sequences. Hence
little is known about which sequence is best and under what
circumstances. This study compares the effects of each
sequence on students’ experiences of learning in engineering
in a UK university. The research methods included
interviews, a survey and a critical incident questionnaire.
The results demonstrated that the type of dialogue and the
discussion sequence have important effects on learning. The
findings are discussed in relation to social constructivist
theories of learning and in relation to the implications for
teaching in wired classrooms.
Abstract: There is a considerable body of evidence
supporting the view that traditional lecturing, where the
students receive the lecturer's wisdom in full flow with
only an occasional lapse into interaction, is flawed.'
Attempts have been made in recent years to use technology in
the form of computers and multimedia to improve upon the
lecture, but, while clearly of growing importance, these are
also encountering constraints. In this paper we describe the
use of a different technique to improve lectures.
Abstract: Yes, there is a tool that allows you to provide two-way
communication between a presenter and their audience. It is
called an Audience Response System, or ARS for short. ARS is
known to audiences by various names: electronic
polling/voting system, reply system, group response system,
classroom polling system, touchpads or "clickers" and "those
things they use on the game shows." However you want to
refer to them, they are an effective means of providing
two-way communication between presenters and their
audiences--one that is used all over the globe to help keep
meeting attendees active and participating in meeting
events.
Robertson, L.J. (2000). Twelve tips for using a computerized
interactive audience response system, Medical Teacher,
Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 237-239.
Abstract: The role of the lecture in medical
education has recently been called into question. Adults
learn more effectively through active learning therefore
where is the place for the traditional lecture? This paper
describes the use of a computerised audience response system
to transform large group teaching sessions into active
learning experiences, thereby securing a future for the
lecture format. We pass on our tips, gleaned from our varied
experiences using the system, for the successful design and
running of such interactive sessions.
Roy, K.H. (1996). Pilot
investigation of the utility of a student response system in
medical student lectures, Journal of Audiovisual Media in
Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 27-32.
Sahadeo, D. & Davis W.E. (1998). Review—Don’t Repeat,
College Teaching, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 111-112.
Steinert, U., & Snell, L.S. (1999). Interactive lecturing:
Strategies for increasing participation in large group
presentations, Medical Teacher, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.
37-42.
Abstract: Interactive lecturing involves an increased
interchange between teachers, students and the lecture
content. The use of interactive lectures can promote active
learning, heighten attention and motivation, give feedback
to the teacher and the student, and increase satisfaction
for both. This article describes a number
of interactive techniques that can be used in large group
presentations as well as general strategies that can promote
interactivity during lectures.
If you have questions or comments about this page please
.
Office of Educational Development
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
4301 W. Markham St., #595
Little Rock, AR 72205