Increasing evidence from
individual ‘learning skills’ counseling sessions at UAMS suggests that one
reason for low achievement is that students often do not realize what they know
and don’t know until after they get the results of their first round of tests.
The goal of a collaborative project between OED and the College of Nursing (CON)
faculty to address this problem has resulted in a series of web-based lessons to
teach students some of the skills needed to monitor their understanding as they
are studying.
The first step in the
project was to identify skills that students needed to monitor their
understanding. Some of these skills were the ability to identify relevant
material, visualize lecture and textbook information, condense and organize
information, and the ability to identify learning tasks represented by different
types of test questions.
Data
from several UAMS studies have verified the importance of comprehension
monitoring of some of the above skills. In one study (Garrett and Perrot,
2002), two groups of students in a pathophysiology course were matched on the
basis of scores on a previous exam. One group used web-based practice exams
several times to monitor their learning, along with study sessions after each
practice test. The other group answered practice test questions only once, the
night before the exam.
When test scores of the
two groups on the next exam were compared, the average score of students who
used practice questions more than once to monitor their learning was 87.2.
The average score of students who used the practice questions only once was
81.4, which was significantly lower than that of the group which used practice
tests to continuously monitor their learning ( p<0 .01).
In another study (Garrett,
Gardner, Born, and Alman, 2004), three skills thought to be involved in
comprehension monitoring—1) comprehend spoken information (students
sketch structures as descriptions are read), 2) interpret diagrams
(students describe and/or answer questions that test their understanding of
diagrams), and 3) traditional reading comprehension, such as passages
typically included on entrance exams—were studied in a group of entering College
of Pharmacy students. With achievement on the first physiology exam as the
criterion variable, the ability to comprehend spoken information (r = 0.23)
and the ability to interpret diagrams (r=0.24) correlated significantly with
achievement on the first exam (p < 0 .05), whereas reading comprehension skills
similar to those traditionally tested on entrance exams did not correlate
significantly with achievement.
Materials from actual
textbooks for two entry-level CON courses, Health Assessment and
Foundations, were used in developing examples and exercises included in each
instructional program. Each program (PowerPoint slides with audio) was
compressed using Impatica so it could be used more easily by students who
connect to the Internet by phone modems. Another component of the learning
skills program was a pretest (not web-based) to assess certain types of learning
skills considered to be used in comprehension monitoring.
Draft versions of these
materials have been used in ‘face-to-face’ CON prematriculation sessions since
2003. After two years of testing, final editing of slides was completed, audio
for these programs was recorded by Dale Seidenschwarz of Creative Services, and
the web-based materials were ready for use on May 19, 2005.
One
advantage of these web-based materials is that they will be available to all
entering CON students, not just those participating in the prematriculation
program. Although these materials are specific to learning skills that are
especially important in CON courses, another advantage of these programs is that
they can be used as a template to develop ‘learning skills’ for students in
other UAMS programs. For further information about these materials, contact Dr.
Judy Garrett at 686-7349.