| Department: |
UAMS Human
Research Advisory Committee |
|
Policy
Number: |
17.11 |
|
Section: |
Special
Populations |
|
Effective
Date: |
July 31,
2002 |
|
Revision
Date: |
|
SUBJECT: Stored Data or Tissues
Operation of the Repository and its
data management center should be subject to oversight by an Human Research
Advisory Committee (HRAC). The HRAC should review and approve a protocol
specifying the conditions under which data and specimens may be accepted and
shared, and ensuring adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and
maintain the confidentiality of data. The HRAC should also review and approve a
sample collection protocol and informed consent document for distribution to
tissue collectors and their local HRACs. A Certificate of Confidentiality should
be obtained to protect confidentiality of repository specimens and data.
1.
Human Tissue Repositories collect, store, and distribute human tissue
materials for research purposes. Repository activities involve three components:
(i) the collectors of tissue samples; (ii) the repository storage and data
management center; and (iii) the recipient investigators.
2.
If supported by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), each
component must satisfy certain regulatory requirements.
|
Tissue Collector |
|
Repository Storage |
|
Recipient
Investigator |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tissue Collector |
|
|
Recipient
Investigator | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tissue Collector |
|
|
Recipient
Investigator |
|
|
|
|
|
HRAC Review |
HRAC Review |
Recipient
Agreement |
|
The Office for Protection
from Research Risks (OPRR) provides the following guidance in response to
requests from Institutional Review Boards, the National Institute of
General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), and the research community. | |
|
1. |
Local HRAC
Review.
Collection of data and specimens for inclusion in the NIGMS Human Genetic
Mutant Cell Repository should be subject to oversight by local
Institutional Review Boards (HRACs) convened by the collecting
institutions under OPRR-approved Assurances.1 The local HRAC is
familiar with the particular circumstances of its research setting and is
in the best position to weigh critical considerations like local
professional and community standards, institutional policies and
resources, and the needs of differing patient or subject
populations. |
|
2. |
Informed
Consent.
Written informed consent should be obtained from each donor-subject in
accordance with Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations
at 45CFR46.116. |
|
|
Included among the basic
elements of informed consent should be a clear description of (i) the
operation of the cell repository; (ii) the specific types of research to
be conducted; (iii) conditions under which data and specimens will be
released to recipient-investigators; and (iv) procedures for protecting
the privacy of subjects and maintaining the confidentiality of data.
Informed consent information describing the nature and purposes of the
research should be as specific as possible. Where human genetic research
is anticipated, informed consent information should include information
about the consequences of DNA typing (e.g., regarding possible paternity
determinations). Informed consent documents may not include any
exculpatory language through which subjects are made to waive or appear to
waive any legal rights. |
|
|
The Cell Repository
should provide tissue collectors with an NIGMS-approved sample informed
consent document containing these elements and with a sample protocol for
tissue collection. HRACs may request copies of these sample documents to
assist in their review of local informed consent documents and
protocols. |
|
3. |
Oversight of Repository
Activities. Operation of the NIGMS
Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository and its data management center should
be subject to oversight by an Institutional Review Board (HRAC) convened
by the Coriell Institute of Medical Research under an OPRR-approved
Assurance of Compliance. The HRAC should review and approve a protocol
specifying the conditions under which data and specimens may be accepted
and shared, and ensuring adequate provisions to protect the privacy of
subjects and maintain the confidentiality of data. The HRAC should also
review and approve a sample collection protocol and informed consent
document for distribution to tissue collectors and their local HRACs. A
Certificate of Confidentiality should be obtained to protect
confidentiality of repository specimens and data. |
|
4. |
Submittal
Agreement. A written submittal
agreement for tissue collectors should require written informed consent of
the donor-subjects utilizing an informed consent document approved by the
local HRAC. It should also contain an acknowledgment that collectors are
prohibited from providing recipient-investigators with access to the
identities of donor-subjects or to information through which the
identities of donor-subjects may readily be ascertained. |
|
5. |
Usage
Agreement. A written usage
agreement for recipient-investigators should include the following:
"Recipient acknowledges that the conditions for use of this research
material are governed by the cell repository Institutional Review Board
(HRAC) in accordance with Department of Health and Human Services
regulations at 45CFR46. Recipient agrees to comply fully with all such
conditions and to report promptly to the cell repository any proposed
changes in the research project and any unanticipated problems involving
risks to subjects or others. Recipient remains subject to applicable State
or local laws or regulations and institutional policies which provide
additional protections for human subjects. This research material may only
be utilized in accordance with the conditions stipulated by the cell
repository HRAC. Any additional use of this material requires prior review
and approval by the cell repository HRAC and, where appropriate, by an
HRAC at the recipient site, which must be convened under an applicable
OPRR-approved Assurance." |
|
6. |
Under certain
circumstances, collecting institutions may elect to rely upon the Cell
Repository HRAC at Coriell Institute. This requires a written Cooperative
Amendment, signed by the collecting institution and the Coriell Institute,
and approved by OPRR. Contact OPRR fordetails. |
In response to requests from
the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), the Office for
Protection from Research Risks (OPRR) provides the following clarification
regarding submission of "non-identifiable" materials to the Human Genetic Mutant
Cell Repository.
As Chart 1
(attached) illustrates, human subjects are involved in research when the
research involves (i) an intervention or interaction with a living individual
that would not occur (or would occur in some other fashion) but for the
research; or (ii) the use of identifiable private data or information in
a form associable with a living individual [45CFR16.102(f)].
|
Human subjects would not
be involved when material submitted to the Repository satisfies
both of the following conditions: | |
|
1. |
The material, in its
entirety, was collected for purposes other than submission to the
Repository (e.g., the material was collected solely for clinical purposes,
or for legitimate but unrelated research purposes, with no "extra"
material collected for submission to the Repository). |
|
and |
|
|
2. |
The material is submitted
to the Repository without any identifiable private data or information
(i.e., no codes or linkers of any sort may be maintained, either by the
Submitter or by the Repository, that would permit access to identifiable
private data or information about the living individual from whom the
material was obtained). |
While OPRR
requires neither an Assurance of Compliance nor a Certification of Institutional
Review Board (HRAC) review [45CFR46.103(a),(f)]
for activities that do not involve human subjects, local institutional
requirements regarding review of such activities are, nevertheless, binding.
Some institutions may require HRAC or administrative review of all research
activities involving human materials, even where "human subjects" are not
involved.
|
OPRR offers the following
guidance concerning operation of human cell repositories under Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human
subjects (45 CFR
46). The guidance assumes that repository activities include
nonexempt human subjects research as defined under HHS
regulations. | ||
|
1. |
The operation of any
HHS-supported human cell repository and its data management center should
be subject to oversight by an Institutional Review Board (HRAC) convened
under an applicable OPRR-approved Assurance of Compliance. This HRAC
should set the conditions under which data and specimens may be accepted
and shared. OPRR strongly recommends that one such condition stipulate
that recipient-investigators not be provided access to the identities of
donor-subjects or to information through which the identities of
donor-subjects may readily be ascertained. | |
|
2. |
Collection of data and
specimens should be subject to oversight by local HRACs convened under
applicable OPRR-approved Assurances. | |
|
3. |
Written informed consent
should be obtained from each donor-subject in accordance with HHS
regulations at 45CFR46.116. Included among the basic elements of informed
consent should be a clear description of (i) the operation of the cell
repository; (ii) the specific types of research to be conducted; (iii) the
conditions under which data and specimens will be released to
recipient-investigators; and (iv) procedures for protecting the privacy of
subjects and maintaining the confidentiality of data. | |
|
4. |
Informed consent
information describing the nature and purposes of the research should be
as specific as possible. | |
|
5. |
Where human genetic
research is anticipated, informed consent information should include
information about the consequences of DNA typing (e.g., regarding possible
paternity determinations). | |
|
6. |
Informed consent
documents may not include any exculpatory language through which subjects
are made to waive or appear to waive any legal rights. | |
|
7. |
OPRR recommends that the
cell repository develop a sample collection protocol and informed consent
document for distribution to collector-investigators and their local
HRACs. | |
|
8. |
A
written submittal agreement for collector-investigators should require
written informed consent of the donor-subjects utilizing an informed
consent document approved by the local HRAC. It should also contain an
acknowledgment that collector-investigators are prohibited from providing
recipient-investigators with access to the identities of donor-subjects or
to information through which the identities of donor-subjects may readily
be ascertained. | |
|
9. |
A
written usage agreement for recipient-investigators should include the
following: | |
|
|
"Recipient acknowledges
that the conditions for use of this research material are governed by the
cell repository Institutional Review Board (HRAC) in accordance with
Department of Health and Human Services regulations at 45CFR46. Recipient
agrees to comply fully with all such conditions and to report promptly to
the cell repository any proposed changes in the research project and any
unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others. Recipient
remains subject to applicable State or local laws or regulations and
institutional policies which provide additional protections for human
subjects. | |
|
|
This research material
may only be utilized in accordance with the conditions stipulated by the
cell repository HRAC. Any additional use of this material requires prior
review and approval by the cell repository HRAC and, where appropriate, by
an HRAC at the recipient site, which must be convened under an applicable
OPRR-approved Assurance. | |
|
10. |
OPRR
recommends that a Certificate of Confidentiality be obtained to protect
confidentiality of human cell repository specimens and data. | |