An endowment in memory of the actors Bruce
and Brandon Lee has been established to fund a scholarship for a senior
medical student according to the following guidelines:
The award (currently $3,000) may be given each
year to a third-year medical student selected to concentrate a portion
of his or her academic studies during the fourth year to conduct a study
of ethical and human values issues concerning their clinical
experience. Up to 4 credit hours can be earned for the study project.
A written report of the project will be submitted before graduation.
To learn more about the scholarship or to
discuss potential projects, feel free to contact Dr. Chris Hackler by
phone or email (chackler@uams.edu)
well in advance of the deadline.
To apply for the scholarship submit one
copy of the application form (link below) by April 15. You may send by
campus mail to Slot 646 or electronically to
MedicalHumanities@uams.edu.
Recipients of the award will be chosen by a review committee selected by
the Division of Medical Humanities.
Bio-banking is an expanding and critical resource to cancer
research and treatment advances. This proposal specifically
addresses the bio-banking disparity in African Americans
(AA), who have the highest cancer rate yet donate their
tissue less and have less trust than other patient
populations. This study will assess AA patient
understanding of bio-banking and whether educating them
about it influences their decision. Understanding the nature
and risk should ensure patient trust and help maintain this
vast resource.
Title
Is Enforced Contraception Ethically Usable in the Acutely
Mentally Ill?
Abstract
Due either to their disease or their medications, some
acutely incapacitated mental patients experience a
heightened sexuality. They are hospitalized with others in
the same condition. Research and experience demonstrate that
sexual encounters happen in such settings. The female
patient is at risk for two physical consequences of
unmodified sexual intercourse--pregnancy and sexually
transmitted disease. Modern contraceptive techniques have
all but removed the possibility of pregnancy if used
properly. Since such incapacitated patients are already
being restrained and treated against their will for the
protection of themselves or others, is it ethical to also
protect them from a pregnancy for which they are not
prepared?
Title
Supporting Breast Cancer Survivors -- What Is Enough?
Abstract
Medical advances have allowed physicians to repair breast
cancer patients’ physical deformities in the wake of the
disease. However, countless studies have concluded that
there are voids in treatment which must be equally attended
- namely the psychosocial, the emotional, and the spiritual.
Support groups have grown in numbers and in their quality of
service over the years, but is the breast cancer patient
aware of all the services available? Are physicians aware of
what is available for their patients? Are family members and
spouses encouraged to seek support as well? Do rural
patients have access to similar outreach programs as urban
patients? This pilot study was designed to explore some of
these issues in order to better understand the needs of
future breast cancer patients.
Title
Family Presence During Attempted Resuscitation
Abstract
It has been debated recently whether or not relatives should
be allowed present during the attempted resuscitation of
their loved one. Medical professionals from eighty-one
hospitals in Arkansas were surveyed. Two hundred and
twenty-three surveys were returned. Eighty-five respondents
said they would consider allowing family member present
during CPR. One hundred and thirty-one respondents said they
would not consider allowing family presence. The most common
reason given for not allowing family member presence was
that the family was unprepared or that the CPR scene was too
traumatic for family presence. However, other studies have
shown that with some preparation and support some family
members are helped in their grieving process by being
allowed presence. Medical paternalism is not a valid reason
for the routine exclusion of families from the resuscitation
room.
Title
A Structured Discussion Of Ethical Issues Between Junior
Clerks And Advanced Surgical Residents
Abstract
A forum was created to provide an opportunity for junior
medical students on their surgery rotation to discuss
ethical issues with senior surgical residents. A validated
survey was distributed to the students after the first month
of the rotation that assessed emotional stress experienced
by them during the month. Structured discussions between the
students and senior residents were conducted by the Lee
Scholar with assistance from a physician-ethicist from the
Division of Medical Humanities. Discussion focused on the
results of the survey and on a number of ethical issues
typically faced by junior clerks. A control group received
the survey but no intervention.
Discussion sessions were lively, rich, and deep.
Communication between clerks and residents was a recurring
theme of the discussions. An assessment survey was conducted
after all the sessions had been held. Subjective ratings of
the experience were positive. Results of the survey
indicated reduction of stress among the participating
students together with an increase in stress among the
controls, though the results for this small sample size were
not statistically significant.
Title
Genetic Sequencing and Gene Mapping
Abstract
Genetic sequencing and gene mapping have greatly contributed
to our understanding of hereditary cancers, which constitute
5-10% of all malignancies. Since the completion of the Human
Genome Project in 2003, many cancer related genes have been
identified. While these findings have revolutionized the
field of oncology, their utility in predicting cancer
susceptibility in asymptomatic individuals, directing
prophylactic treatments, and guiding family planning
decisions is not fully understood. This investigation aims
to identify cancer-susceptible patients followed at the
Arkansas Cancer Research Center who have been evaluated by a
physician and received appropriate counseling for cancer
genetic testing within the last 24 months. From this
patient population, a subset of patients will be surveyed to
determine factors influencing their individual testing
decisions.
Grantee Responsibilities and Expectations
Grantee Responsibilities and Expectations:
1.The grantee is expected to begin preliminary work on his/her project
by June 1 of the M3 year. Preliminary work includes
a.
identifying a project mentor in the Division of Medical Humanities.
i.The grantee will check-in or meet with his/her mentor regularly
throughout the M4 year.
b.
identifying persons with requisite expertise to help the grantee complete
the proposed project.
c.a
review of the extant literature related to the grantee’s project.
i.An annotated bibliography should be sent to the grantee’s mentor
before October of the M4 year.
d.if the
project includes empirical research, the grantee (with the help of his/her
mentor) must
i.identify or develop the empirical methods/tools to be used.
ii.determine what regulatory processes must be completed (e.g., IRB
approval).
2.During the Fall of the M4 year, the grantee is expected to
a.if the
project has an empirical research component,
i.complete any regulatory processes.
ii.begin data collection.
b.if the
project does not have an empirical component,
i.continue to research and read relevant literature.
ii.develop an outline for the written project.
3.Starting in January of the M4 year, the grantee must
a.meet
monthly (or more) with his/her mentor.
b.if the
project has an empirical research component,
i.complete data collection.
ii.begin analysis of data.
c.if the
project does not have an empirical component,
i.begin writing early drafts of the written project.
4.In March of the M4 year, the grantee must
a.if the
project has an empirical research component,
i.write an empirical research paper of his/her findings.
1.Paper
must include background, methods, results, and discussion.
b.if the
project does not have an empirical component,
i.complete a final version of the written project.
c.THE
PROJECT IS DUE TO BE COMPLETE AND SIGNED OFF BY THE GRANTEE’S MENTOR NO
LATER THAN APRIL 30th OF THE M4 YEAR
Failure to complete the project as proposed to the
Scholarship Committee will result in one of three actions, to be determined
by the grantee’s mentor in consultation with the scholarship committee:
No
loss of credit and full awarding of the monetary scholarship OR
2.Loss some portion of the academic credit to be reported to the
Dean’s office OR
3.Loss some portion of the academic credit to be reported to the
Dean’s office and loss of the monetary award OR
4.Loss of all the academic credit to be reported to the Dean’s
office and loss of the monetary award