|
To be monitored by the CRC DSMB, a protocol must meet the following criteria:
1. All visits are
category A or B (investigator-initiated, research subjects).
2.
All subjects must be studied on this CRC; no sites other
than UAMS, the VA, and ACH may be involved in subject
recruitment.
3.
Unless approved by the
RSA, the study should not propose to
recruit over 100 subjects/year.
4.
The proposed protocol should not involve any organization or
funding source (FDA, commercial sponsor or funding source)
that has authority to suspend the trial.
Investigators
who are proposing a study that requires a DSMB but does not
meet these criteria should discuss the protocol with the
Research Safety Advocate (RSA) before submitting the
protocol to the CRC.
Elements of a DSMP
A DSMP must
include each of the following elements:
1. Risk assessment. The data and safety monitoring plan
should include the adverse event grading (serious or
non-serious) and attribution (probably related, possibly
related, remotely related, unrelated) scales. Classification
of events may follow and refer to the HRAC guidelines.
This section may refer to the Human Studies section
for details of the study risks, but should assess whether
this study is minimal risk or greater than minimal risk; if
sufficient data are not available, risk may be considered
uncertain. Experience with the drug or protocol should be
cited in defending the risk assessment. In most cases this
can be brief; specific risks are addressed under the Human
Studies section of the protocol.
If applicable, particularly if the study falls into
the greater than minimal risk or uncertain risk categories,
an explicit plan for dealing with safety issues that could
lead to study interruption and/or termination should be
included.
2. Monitoring plan. This section should
address the following questions. Who will monitor the study
(PI and coordinators only; PI and Nurse Manager; PI, Nurse
Manager, and RSA; CRC DSMB; other DSMB). How often will the
study be monitored (e.g.,
before a dose escalation, after a certain number of treated
subjects, after a certain time period)? For studies of
minimal risk, the plan may be for the investigator to review
safety data quarterly.
For greater than minimal risk protocols, a committee
is probably desirable to review the data.
What specific elements will be monitored? Who will be
informed of the results of monitoring, and within what time
frame? How will results from abnormal laboratory or standard
diagnostic tests be handled? Will the subject be notified,
and, if so, how and within what time frame? If an entity
other than the investigator is monitoring the study, the
specific information to be reported should be included here.
Briefly justify the data to be monitored and the frequency
with which it will be monitored.
3. Interim study analysis. This section will
apply primarily to clinical trials, particularly those in
which clinical implications or safety dictate that the trial
should be stopped early if significant positive or negative
findings emerge. Will the data be analyzed by the
investigators or an external body at any point before the
conclusion of the study? Will this interim analysis be used
to stop the study? Who will make that decision, and using
what criteria? Is there any justification for monitoring
significance during the course of this trial?
4.
Reporting
plans. This section must include a statement on how
the HRAC, the RSA, and the CRC administration will be
informed of adverse events and safety concerns, particularly
for studies that are monitored by an external board. The
plan should include annual reporting of adverse events to
the IRB, CRC, and other required agencies or departments.
Any other entities that will receive adverse event reports
should be specified in the DSMP. This section must also
address plans to inform the CRC Administration and the RSA
if for any reason the IRB or any other body temporarily or
permanently suspends the study, and should address the time
frame within which this will be done. For reporting timeframes please see
Supplemental
Guidelines.
5. Data accuracy and protocol compliance. How
will adherence to the protocol be assured? How will data be
handled? How will it be stored, who will have access to it,
how will security be addressed? Confidentiality issues
should be addressed here or the relevant section of the
Human Studies should be referenced.
6. Conflict of interest. Any possible
conflicts of interest between the study personnel,
particularly the PI, must be addressed in the plan. If these
conflicts affect the ability of the PI to objectively
monitor the progress and safety of the study, the plan
should include some external monitor (RSA, Nurse Manager, or
other physician).
It is the consensus opinion of the CRC
administration that exchanging of payments of money or financial instruments of
any kind constitutes a conflict of interest in the broadest sense of that term.
Although the conflict of interest threshold for the UAMS Conflict of Interest
Statement is an exchange of $10,000 or 5% of stock in a company, the CRC
Administration and CRC Scientific Advisory Committee have determined that an exchange of
money of any amount constitutes a conflict of interest or, at the very least,
the appearance of a conflict of interest that should be openly acknowledged and
addressed. Thus, we request that every investigator applying to use the CRC,
specify in the Data & Safety Monitoring Plan, Item #6: Conflict of Interest
any payment of cash, stock, or other items of value received by the PI or any
study personnel from the sponsoring company. These payments could include direct
payments of money for consulting as well as stock, stock options, or any other
financial instruments such as the promise of future pay or a loan of money under
particularly favorable circumstances. The Data and Safety Monitoring Plan should
address the way in which these potential conflicts will be handled by the
investigator so that objectivity and patient safety are appropriately
safeguarded.
DSMP
Definitions
DSMP Samples by Document
Section
(Word)
(PDF version)
DSMP
Questions? Please send to
Cindy
Henrich, MS, or call 501-257-5882.
|