Department of Veterans Affairs UAMS Home GCRC Home UAMS College of Medicine
CRC Home
CRC Services
CRC Staff/Contacts
In the News
Protocol Application
Citing the CRC
Links
Maps and Directions
Glossary
SAC
CRC FAQs
Search Our Site
Center for Clinical and Translational Research
College of Medicine
COM Research Office
UAMS Home

Guidelines:  CRC Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP)

                      CRC Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)

Every CRC protocol must have a data and safety monitoring plan. The need for a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) extends to multicenter and pharmaceutical sponsored projects whether or not the project has an external Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). GAC review will not be conducted without the inclusion of necessary elements of the protocol, including a statistical section and a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan. The plan should be tailored to the complexity and risk of the protocol. The CRC has constituted a multidisciplinary Data and Safety Monitoring Board that meets as needed to consider CRC protocols that require monitoring by a DSMB. The following provides a link to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board's charter:  DSMB Charter.  The following provides a link to the Data and Safety Monitoring Report:  DSMB Report.

 

To be monitored by the CRC DSMB, a protocol must meet the following criteria:

            1. All visits are category A or B (investigator-initiated, research subjects).

2. All subjects must be studied on this CRC; no sites other than UAMS, the VA, and ACH may be involved in subject recruitment.

3. Unless approved by the RSA, the study should not propose to recruit over 100 subjects/year.

4. The proposed protocol should not involve any organization or funding source (FDA, commercial sponsor or funding source) that has authority to suspend the trial.

Investigators who are proposing a study that requires a DSMB but does not meet these criteria should discuss the protocol with the Research Safety Advocate (RSA) before submitting the protocol to the CRC.

Elements of a DSMP

            A DSMP must include each of the following elements:

            1. Risk assessment.   The data and safety monitoring plan should include the adverse event grading (serious or non-serious) and attribution (probably related, possibly related, remotely related, unrelated) scales. Classification of events may follow and refer to the HRAC guidelines. This section may refer to the Human Studies section for details of the study risks, but should assess whether this study is minimal risk or greater than minimal risk; if sufficient data are not available, risk may be considered uncertain. Experience with the drug or protocol should be cited in defending the risk assessment. In most cases this can be brief; specific risks are addressed under the Human Studies section of the protocol.  If applicable, particularly if the study falls into the greater than minimal risk or uncertain risk categories, an explicit plan for dealing with safety issues that could lead to study interruption and/or termination should be included. 

            2. Monitoring plan. This section should address the following questions. Who will monitor the study (PI and coordinators only; PI and Nurse Manager; PI, Nurse Manager, and RSA; CRC DSMB; other DSMB). How often will the study be monitored (e.g., before a dose escalation, after a certain number of treated subjects, after a certain time period)? For studies of minimal risk, the plan may be for the investigator to review safety data quarterly.  For greater than minimal risk protocols, a committee is probably desirable to review the data.  What specific elements will be monitored? Who will be informed of the results of monitoring, and within what time frame? How will results from abnormal laboratory or standard diagnostic tests be handled? Will the subject be notified, and, if so, how and within what time frame? If an entity other than the investigator is monitoring the study, the specific information to be reported should be included here. Briefly justify the data to be monitored and the frequency with which it will be monitored.  

            3. Interim study analysis. This section will apply primarily to clinical trials, particularly those in which clinical implications or safety dictate that the trial should be stopped early if significant positive or negative findings emerge. Will the data be analyzed by the investigators or an external body at any point before the conclusion of the study? Will this interim analysis be used to stop the study? Who will make that decision, and using what criteria? Is there any justification for monitoring significance during the course of this trial?

            4. Reporting plans. This section must include a statement on how the HRAC, the RSA, and the CRC administration will be informed of adverse events and safety concerns, particularly for studies that are monitored by an external board. The plan should include annual reporting of adverse events to the IRB, CRC, and other required agencies or departments. Any other entities that will receive adverse event reports should be specified in the DSMP. This section must also address plans to inform the CRC Administration and the RSA if for any reason the IRB or any other body temporarily or permanently suspends the study, and should address the time frame within which this will be done.  For reporting timeframes please see Supplemental Guidelines.

           5. Data accuracy and protocol compliance. How will adherence to the protocol be assured? How will data be handled? How will it be stored, who will have access to it, how will security be addressed? Confidentiality issues should be addressed here or the relevant section of the Human Studies should be referenced.

           6. Conflict of interest. Any possible conflicts of interest between the study personnel, particularly the PI, must be addressed in the plan. If these conflicts affect the ability of the PI to objectively monitor the progress and safety of the study, the plan should include some external monitor (RSA, Nurse Manager, or other physician).
It is the consensus opinion of the CRC administration that exchanging of payments of money or financial instruments of any kind constitutes a conflict of interest in the broadest sense of that term. Although the conflict of interest threshold for the UAMS Conflict of Interest Statement is an exchange of $10,000 or 5% of stock in a company, the CRC Administration and CRC Scientific Advisory Committee have determined that an exchange of money of any amount constitutes a conflict of interest or, at the very least, the appearance of a conflict of interest that should be openly acknowledged and addressed. Thus, we request that every investigator applying to use the CRC, specify in the Data & Safety Monitoring Plan, Item #6: Conflict of Interest any payment of cash, stock, or other items of value received by the PI or any study personnel from the sponsoring company. These payments could include direct payments of money for consulting as well as stock, stock options, or any other financial instruments such as the promise of future pay or a loan of money under particularly favorable circumstances. The Data and Safety Monitoring Plan should address the way in which these potential conflicts will be handled by the investigator so that objectivity and patient safety are appropriately safeguarded.

DSMP Definitions

DSMP Samples by Document Section (Word)  (PDF version)

DSMP Questions?  Please send to Cindy Henrich, MS, or call 501-257-5882.


Clinical Research Center
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
4301 W. Markham St.  Slot 577,  Little Rock, AR 72205
Room 2111, Reynolds Institute on Aging
For an Appointment or Information Call the CRC at 1-501-526-7800
Contact us with comments about the CRC website.

Page Updated 3/30/2007 9:36:39 AM